banner



Home  ›  What Can A Slider Web Tattoo Turn Into

What Can A Slider Web Tattoo Turn Into

Written By Thursday, April 14, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Dermatologic procedure to remove tattoo pigments

Quanta System Discovery

Case of a tattoo removal laser

External audio
Old (8497164706).jpg
audio icon "Rethinking Ink", Distillations Podcast Episode 220, Scientific discipline History Institute

Tattoo removal has been performed with various tools since the beginning of tattooing. While tattoos are generally considered permanent, information technology is at present possible to remove them with treatments, fully or partially.

The "standard modality for tattoo removal"[i] is the non-invasive removal of tattoo pigments using Q-switched lasers. Unlike types of Q-switched lasers are used to target different colors of tattoo ink depending on the specific light absorption spectra of the tattoo pigments. Typically, black and other darker-colored inks tin exist removed completely using Q-switched lasers while lighter colors such as yellows and greens are still very difficult to remove. Success can depend on a wide diversity of factors including skin color, ink color, and the depth at which the ink was applied.[2] [1]

Q-switched lasers first became commercially available in the early 1990s. For a couple of decades earlier that, continuous-wave lasers were used equally medical lasers for tattoo removal. Continuous-wave lasers used a loftier energy beam that ablated the target expanse and destroyed surrounding tissue structures besides every bit tattoo ink. Treatment tended to be painful and cause scarring.[2] [ane]

Before the development of laser tattoo removal methods, common techniques included dermabrasion, TCA (Trichloroacetic acid, an acid that removes the top layers of skin, reaching as deep as the layer in which the tattoo ink resides), salabrasion (scrubbing the pare with salt), cryosurgery, and excision, which is sometimes still used along with skin grafts for larger tattoos.[3] [1] [4] Many other methods for removing tattoos have been suggested historically including the injection or application of tannic acrid, lemon juice, garlic, and pigeon dung.[five] [6]

Recent research is investigating the potential of multi-pass treatments and the use of picosecond laser technology, which seem promising.[seven] [8] [9]

Motives [edit]

A poll conducted in January 2012 by Harris Interactive reported that 1 in 7 (fourteen%) of the 21% of American adults who have a tattoo regret getting one. The poll did not study the reasons for these regrets, only a poll that was done four years prior reported that the most common reasons were "likewise young when I got the tattoo" (xx%), "it'due south permanent" and "I'm marked for life" (19%), and "I just don't like it" (18%). An before poll showed that 19% of Britons with tattoos suffered regret, as did 11% of Italians with tattoos.[10]

Surveys of tattoo removal patients were done in 1996 and 2006 and provided more than insight. Of those polled, the patients who regretted their tattoos typically obtained their tattoos in their belatedly teens or early twenties, and were evenly distributed by gender. Amongst those seeking removals, more than half reported that they "suffered embarrassment." A new task, issues with apparel, and a significant life result were also commonly cited every bit motivations.[eleven] Tattoos that were in one case a symbol of inclusion in a group, such as a gang, can make information technology difficult to become employed.[2] Tattoos that indicate a significant relationship, such equally a spouse, girlfriend, or beau, tin can become problematic if the relationship ends.[12] Angelina Jolie, Eva Longoria, Marc Anthony, and Denise Richards are some of the celebrities who take had this kind of tattoo removed.[13]

The pick to get a tattoo that is later regretted is related to the finish-of-history illusion in which teenagers and adults of all ages know that their tastes take changed regularly over the years before the electric current moment but believe that their tastes volition somehow not continue to grow and mature in the futurity.[14] As a issue, they wrongly believe that any tattoo that appeals to them today will e'er appeal to them in the time to come.

Removal by replacement [edit]

Some wearers decide to encompass an unwanted tattoo with a new tattoo. This is ordinarily known as a cover-up. An artfully done camouflage may render the old tattoo completely invisible, though this will depend largely on the size, style, colors and techniques used on the old tattoo and the skill of the tattoo artist.[15] Covering upwardly a previous tattoo necessitates darker tones in the new tattoo to effectively hide the older, unwanted piece.[xvi] Many tattoos are too dark to cover up and in those cases patients may receive laser tattoo removal to lighten the existing ink to make themselves better candidates for a comprehend upwardly tattoo.[ commendation needed ]

Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation removal [edit]

Tattoo removal is nearly usually performed using lasers that break down the ink particles in the tattoo into smaller particles. Dermal macrophages are part of the immune arrangement, tasked with collecting and digesting cellular droppings. In the example of tattoo pigments, macrophages collect ink pigments, only accept difficulty breaking them downwards. Instead, they store the ink pigments. If a macrophage is damaged, information technology releases its captive ink, which is taken up past other macrophages. This can brand it especially difficult to remove tattoos. When treatments break down ink particles into smaller pieces, macrophages tin more than easily remove them.[17]

Tattoo pigments take specific light assimilation spectra. A tattoo laser must be capable of emitting adequate energy within the given absorption spectrum of the pigment to provide an constructive treatment. Certain tattoo pigments, such as yellows and fluorescent inks are more challenging to care for than darker blacks and blues, because they have absorption spectra that fall outside or on the edge of the emission spectra available in the tattoo removal laser.[3] Recent pastel coloured inks comprise loftier concentrations of titanium dioxide which is highly reflective. Consequently, such inks are difficult to remove since they reverberate a pregnant amount of the incident calorie-free energy out of the skin.[18] [iii]

The gold standard of tattoo removal treatment modality is considered to be laser tattoo removal using multiple separate Q-switched lasers (depending on the specific wavelengths needed for the dyes involved) over a number of repeat visits. There are several types of Q-switched lasers, and each is effective at removing a different range of the color spectrum.[9] [one] Lasers developed during or after 2006 provide multiple wavelengths and can successfully treat a much broader range of tattoo pigments than previous individual Q-switched lasers. Unfortunately the dye systems used to change the wavelength event in significant power reduction such that the utilise of multiple carve up specific wavelength lasers remains the aureate standard.[ commendation needed ]

The free energy density (fluence), expressed every bit joules/cm2, is adamant prior to each treatment besides as the spot size and repetition rate (hertz). To mitigate pain the preferred method is simply to cool the area before and during handling with a medical-grade chiller/libation and to use a topical coldhearted. During the treatment process, the light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation axle passes through the skin, targeting the ink resting in a liquid country within. While it is possible to see immediate results, in about cases the fading occurs gradually over the 7–8 week healing period between treatments.[xix]

Q-switched lasers are reported by the National Institutes of Health to event in scarring only rarely. Areas with sparse peel will be more likely to scar than thicker-skinned areas.[20]

By 2023, the light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation tattoo removal market is expected to grow 12.7% annually.[21]

Mechanism of light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation action [edit]

Experimental observations of the furnishings of brusque-pulsed lasers on tattoos were first reported in the belatedly 1960s by Leon Goldman and others.[22] [23] [24] In 1979 an argon laser was used for tattoo removal in 28 patients, with limited success. In 1978 a carbon dioxide laser was likewise used, but considering it targeted water, a chromophore present in all cells, this type of light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation generally acquired scarring after treatments.[25] [3] [26] [2]

In the early on 1980s, a new clinical report began in Canniesburn Hospital's Burns and Plastic Surgery Unit, in Glasgow, Scotland, into the effects of Q-switched ruby laser energy on blue/black tattoos.[22] [27] Farther studies into other tattoo colors were then carried out with diverse degrees of success.[28] Enquiry at the Academy of Strathclyde, Glasgow also showed that there was no detectable mutagenicity in tissues following irradiation with the Q-switched cherry-red laser.[29] This essentially shows that the handling is safe, from a biological viewpoint, with no detectable risk of the development of cancerous cells.[30]

Information technology was non until the late 1980s that Q-switched lasers became commercially practical with the starting time marketed laser coming from Derma-lase Express, Glasgow.[31] [32] One of the commencement American published articles describing laser tattoo removal was authored by a group at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1990.[22] [33]

Tattoos consist of thousands of particles of tattoo pigment suspended in the pare.[34] While normal human growth and healing processes will remove small foreign particles from the skin, tattoo pigment particles are too big to be removed automatically. Laser handling causes tattoo pigment particles to heat up and fragment into smaller pieces. These smaller pieces are and so removed by normal trunk processes. Q-switched lasers produce bursts of infrared low-cal at specific frequencies that target a particular spectrum of colour in the tattoo ink. The light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation passes through the upper layers of the skin to target a specific paint in the lower layers.[two]

Laser tattoo removal is a successful application of the theory of selective photothermolysis (SPTL).[35] However, unlike treatments for blood vessels or hair the mechanism required to shatter tattoo particles uses the photomechanical effect. In this situation the energy is captivated past the ink particles in a very brusque time, typically nanoseconds. The surface temperature of the ink particles tin rise to thousands of degrees merely this energy profile rapidly collapses into a stupor moving ridge. This shock moving ridge then propagates throughout the local tissue (the dermis) causing brittle structures to fragment. Hence tissues are largely unaffected since they only vibrate as the shock moving ridge passes. For laser tattoo removal the selective destruction of tattoo pigments depends on four factors:

  • The color of the light must penetrate sufficiently deep into the peel to achieve the tattoo pigment. Pigments deeper in the skin are harder to remove than those near the surface.[2]
  • The color of the laser light must exist more than highly captivated by the tattoo pigment than the surrounding pare. Different tattoo pigments therefore require different light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation colors. For example, scarlet light is highly captivated by greenish tattoo pigments, while yellow tends not to absorb low-cal.[2]
  • The time duration (pulse duration) of the laser energy must exist very brusque, then that the tattoo paint is heated to fragmentation temperature before its heat tin can dissipate to the surrounding skin. Otherwise, heating of the surrounding tissue can cause burns or scars. For laser tattoo removal, this duration should be on the club of nanoseconds.
  • Sufficient energy must be delivered during each laser pulse to heat the pigment to fragmentation. If the energy is too low, pigment will not fragment and no removal will accept identify.

Q-switched lasers are the merely commercially available devices that can run into these requirements.[36]

Although they occur infrequently, mucosal tattoos can exist successfully treated with Q-switched lasers too.[37]

A novel method for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation tattoo removal using a fractionated CO2 or Erbium:YAG laser, alone or in combination with Q-switched lasers, was reported by Ibrahimi and coworkers from the Wellman Center of Photomedicine at the Massachusetts Full general Hospital in 2011.[38] This new approach to laser tattoo removal may afford the ability to remove colors such as yellow and white, which have proven to be resistant to traditional Q-switched laser therapy.

Laser parameters that bear on results [edit]

Several colors of laser light (quantified by the laser wavelength) are used for tattoo removal, from visible low-cal to near-infrared radiation. Dissimilar lasers are better for different tattoo colors. Consequently, multi-color tattoo removal almost always requires the use of two or more laser wavelengths. Tattoo removal lasers are usually identified past the lasing medium used to create the wavelength (measured in nanometers (nm)):[ citation needed ]

  • Q-switched Frequency-doubled Nd:YAG: 532 nm. This laser creates a light-green light which is highly captivated by red, yellow, and orange targets. Useful primarily for ruby-red and orange tattoo pigments, this wavelength is too highly absorbed by melanin (the chemical which gives skin color or tan) which makes the laser wavelength effective for age spot or sun spot removal. Nd:YAG lasers may cause hemoglobin absorption, leading to purpura (drove of blood under tissue in large areas), pinpoint bleeding, or whitening of the skin.[39]
  • Q-switched Ruby: 694 nm. This laser creates a red light which is highly captivated past green and dark tattoo pigments. Because information technology is more highly absorbed by melanin this laser may produce undesirable side effects such as pigmentary changes for patients of all only white skin.[40] This is the best wavelength for blue ink.
  • Q-switched Alexandrite: 755 nm. The weakest of all the q-switched devices and somewhat similar to the Cherry light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation in that the Alexandrite creates a reddish low-cal which is highly absorbed by light-green and night tattoo pigments. However, the alexandrite light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation color is slightly less captivated by melanin, and then this light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation has a slightly lower incidence of unwanted pigmentary changes than a ruby light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation.[41] This light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation works well on greenish tattoos but considering of its weaker peak power it works only moderately well on black and blue ink. It does not work at all (or very minimally) on red, orange, yellow, brown, etc. This laser wavelength is also available in a picosecond speed with anecdotal claims that it removes ink faster.
  • Q-switched Nd:YAG: 1064 nm. This laser creates a near-infrared lite (invisible to humans) which is poorly captivated by melanin, making this the only laser suitable for darker skin. This laser wavelength is also captivated by all dark tattoo pigments and is the safest wavelength to utilize on the tissue due to the low melanin absorption and low hemoglobin absorption. This is the wavelength of choice for tattoo removal in darker pare types and for black ink.
  • Dye modules are available for some lasers to convert 532 nm to 650 nm or 585 nm light which allows one laser organisation to safely and effectively care for multi-colour tattoo inks. When dye modules take 532 nm laser wavelength and alter information technology, there is a loss of energy. Treatments with dye packs, while effective for the starting time few treatments, many not exist able to clear these ink colors fully. The role of dye lasers in tattoo removal is discussed in item in the literature.[42]

Pulsewidth or pulse duration is a critical laser parameter. All Q-switched lasers have appropriate pulse durations for tattoo removal.[ citation needed ]

Spot size, or the width of the laser axle, affects treatment. Light is optically scattered in the skin, like automobile headlights in fog. Larger spot sizes slightly increment the constructive penetration depth of the light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation light, thus enabling more effective targeting of deeper tattoo pigments. Larger spot sizes likewise aid brand treatments faster.[ citation needed ]

Fluence or free energy density is another important consideration. Fluence is measured in joules per square centimeter (J/cm²). Information technology is important to be treated at high plenty settings to fragment tattoo particles.

Repetition rate helps make treatments faster but is not associated with any treatment consequence. Faster treatments are normally preferred considering the pain ends sooner.

Number of light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation tattoo removal treatment sessions needed [edit]

The number of treatments necessary to remove a tattoo via laser can be predicted past the Kirby-Desai Scale.[43] The number of sessions depends on various parameters, including the area of the body treated, skin colour, ink colour present, scarring, and corporeality of ink present. Effectiveness of the immune system may play a role every bit well.

Complete light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation tattoo removal requires numerous handling sessions, typically spaced at eight weeks or more apart. Treating more than frequently than eight weeks increases the risk of adverse effects and does not necessarily increment the rate of ink assimilation. Anecdotal reports of treatments sessions at four weeks leads to more scarring and dischromia and can be a source of liability for clinicians. At each session, some but non all of the tattoo pigment particles are finer fragmented, and the body removes the smallest fragments over the course of several weeks or months. The outcome is that the tattoo is lightened over fourth dimension. Remaining large particles of tattoo pigment are so targeted at subsequent treatment sessions, causing further lightening. Tattoos located on the extremities, such as the ankle, generally accept longest. As tattoos fade clinicians may recommend that patients wait many months between treatments to facilitate ink resolution and minimize unwanted side effects.

Certain colors have proved more than hard to remove than others. In particular, this occurs when treated with the wrong wavelength of laser low-cal is used. Some take postulated that the reason for ho-hum resolution of green ink in item is due to its significantly smaller molecular size relative to the other colours.[44] Consequently, light-green ink tattoos may crave treatment with 755 nm light but may too respond to 694 nm, 650 nm and 1064 nm. Multiple wavelengths of light may be needed to remove colored inks.

I small Greek written report showed that the R20 method—four passes with the laser, twenty minutes apart—acquired more breaking up of the ink than the conventional method without more than scarring or adverse furnishings. However, this report was performed on a very pocket-sized patient population (12 patients total), using the weakest of the QS lasers, the 755 nm Alexandrite laser. One of the other primary problems with this study was the fact that more than than half of the eighteen tattoos removed were not professional person and amateur tattoos are e'er easier to remove. Proof of concept studies are underway, but many laser experts advise against the R20 method using the more than modern and powerful tattoo removal lasers available at most offices equally an increment in agin side effects including scarring and dischromia is likely. Patients should ask about the laser being used if the R20 treatment method is offered by a facility as information technology is unremarkably only offered by clinics that are using the 755 nm Alexandrite as opposed to the more powerful and versatile devices that are more commonly used. Moreover, dermatologists offering the R20 method should inform patients that it is merely one culling to proven protocols and is non a gilt standard treatment method to remove tattoos.

Multiple pass handling methods (R20, as mentioned above, and R0) take generally shown to behave a greater chance of side furnishings, due to the increased amount of free energy used in treatment. 1 caveat to this, however, is incorporating a perfluorodecalin (PFD) patch into the protocol.[45] A PFD patch utilizes a clear silicone gel patch, with a small amount of PFD liquid applied to the handling surface area immediately before each laissez passer of laser application, and conducting the passes in rapid succession. The combination of the patch and liquid reduce the epidermal scatter, which tin limit the predicted side effects typically seen in aggressive light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation tattoo removal treatments (hyper and hypopigmentation, baking, etc).[46] Additionally, the liquid reduces the laser frosting very quickly, allowing for faster re-handling, limiting the time of handling while notwithstanding improving efficacy. Early on studies have been performed to indicate improved clearance with the use of this patch in iii-four passes, in a single session, utilizing more than energy than typically allowable with a traditional treatment methodology.[47] All these concrete properties of the patch work to substantially reduce the total number of laser treatments required for ink clearance. While the PFD patch is currently FDA cleared for apply with all pico and nanosecond domain lasers and wavelengths, it is just cleared for Fitzpatrick Skin Types I-Iii. Early studies have shown anecdotally that there isn't necessarily increased risks with Fitzpatrick Skin Types Four-6, though still not FDA cleared as an indication.[48]

Factors contributing to the success of laser tattoo removal [edit]

There are a number of factors that determine how many treatments will be needed and the level of success one might experience. Age of tattoo, ink density, color and even where the tattoo is located on the body, and whether the tattoo was professional, or non, all play an important function in how many treatments will be needed for complete removal.[49] However, a rarely recognized factor of tattoo removal is the role of the customer'south immune response.[l] The normal procedure of tattoo removal is fragmentation followed by phagocytosis which is then drained abroad via the lymphatics. Consequently, it is the inflammation resulting from the actual light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation treatment and the natural stimulation of the hosts' allowed response that ultimately results in removal of tattoo ink; thus variations in results are enormous.[51]

Hurting management during treatment [edit]

Laser tattoo removal is painful; many patients say information technology is worse than getting the tattoo. The hurting is oftentimes described to be similar to that of hot oil on the pare, or a "snap" from an elastic band. Depending on the patient's hurting threshold, and while some patients may forgo anesthesia altogether, about patients will require some form of local anesthesia. Pre-handling might include the application of an anesthetic cream nether apoplexy for 45 to 90 minutes or cooling by water ice or cold air prior to the laser treatment session. A amend method is complete anesthesia which can be administered locally by injections of i% to 2% lidocaine with epinephrine.

A technique which helps to reduce the pain sensation felt by patients has been described by MJ Murphy.[52] He used a standard microscope drinking glass slide pressed confronting the tattooed skin and fired the laser through the glass. This technique may correspond a simplest and constructive method to reduce the hurting sensation when treating small tattoos.

Postal service-treatment considerations [edit]

Immediately later on light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation treatment, a slightly elevated, white discoloration with or without the presence of punctuate haemorrhage is oft observed. This white color change is thought to be the result of rapid, heat-formed steam or gas, causing dermal and epidermal vacuolization. Pinpoint bleeding represents vascular injury from photoacoustic waves created by the light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation'south interaction with tattoo pigment. Minimal edema and erythema of adjacent normal peel commonly resolve inside 24 hours. Afterward, a chaff appears over the entire tattoo, which sloughs off at approximately two weeks post-handling. Every bit noted above, some tattoo pigment may be found within this crust. Post-operative wound intendance consists of unproblematic wound care and a non-occlusive dressing. Since the application of light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation light is sterile there is no need for topical antibiotics. Moreover, topical antibody ointments can cause allergic reactions and should be avoided. Fading of the tattoo will be noted over the next eight weeks and re-treatment free energy levels can be tailored depending on the clinical response observed.[53]

Side effects and complications [edit]

About half of the patients treated with Q-switched lasers for tattoo removal will prove some transient changes in the normal skin pigmentation. These changes usually resolve in 6 to 12 months simply may rarely exist permanent.[54]

Hyperpigmentation is related to the patient's skin tone, with skin types 4, 5 and VI more decumbent regardless of the wavelength used. Twice daily treatment with hydroquinones and broad-spectrum sunscreens commonly resolves the hyperpigmentation inside a few months, although, in some patients, resolution can be prolonged.[54]

Hypopigmentation is more commonly observed in darker skin tones. It is more likely to occur with higher fluence and more frequent treatments. Sometimes lighter skin exhibits hypopigmentation after a series of treatments. Allowing more than time between treatments reduces chances of hypopigmentation. Since it is more likely to see hypopigmentation after multiple treatments, some practitioners advise waiting a few additional weeks, after a few sessions. Usually handling stops until hypopigmentation resolves in a affair of months.

Transient textural changes are occasionally noted merely frequently resolve inside a few months; however, permanent textural changes and scarring very rarely occur. If a patient is prone to pigmentary or textural changes, longer handling intervals are recommended. Additionally, if a blister or crust forms post-obit treatment, it is imperative that the patient does not manipulate this secondary skin change. Early on removal of a blister or chaff increases the chances of developing a scar. Additionally, patients with a history of hypertrophic or keloidal scarring need to exist warned of their increased risk of scarring.

Local allergic responses to many tattoo pigments accept been reported, and allergic reactions to tattoo pigment after Q-switched light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation treatment are likewise possible. Rarely, when yellowish cadmium sulfide is used to "brighten" the carmine or yellow portion of a tattoo, a photoallergic reaction may occur. The reaction is also common with blood-red ink, which may contain cinnabar (mercuric sulphide). Erythema, pruritus, and even inflamed nodules, verrucose papules, or granulomas may present. The reaction will be confined to the site of the red/yellowish ink. Treatment consists of strict sunlight avoidance, sunscreen, interlesional steroid injections, or in some cases, surgical removal. Unlike the destructive modalities described, Q-switched lasers mobilize the ink and may generate a systemic allergic response. Oral antihistamines and anti-inflammatory steroids accept been used to treat allergic reactions to tattoo ink.

Studies of various tattoo pigments take shown that a number of pigments (most containing iron oxide or titanium dioxide) alter color when irradiated with Q-switched light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation energy. Some tattoo colors including flesh tones, light red, white, peach and low-cal chocolate-brown containing pigments as well as some light-green and blue tattoo pigments, changed to black when irradiated with Q-switched laser pulses. The resulting gray-black color may crave more than treatments to remove. If tattoo darkening does occur, after viii weeks the newly darkened tattoo can be treated as if it were black paint.[55]

Very rarely, non Q-switched laser treatments, like CO2 or Argon lasers, which are very rarely offered these days, can rupture blood vessels and aerosolize tissue requiring a plastic shield or a cone device to protect the laser operator from tissue and blood contact. Protective eyewear may be worn if the laser operator chooses to practice and then.

With the mechanical or salabrasion method of tattoo removal, the incidence of scarring, pigmentary alteration (hyper- and hypopigmentation), and ink retentiveness are extremely loftier.[56]

The use of Q-switched lasers could very rarely produce the development of large bulla. Yet, if patients follow postal service care directions to elevate, residue, and apply intermittent icing, it should minimize the chances of bulla and other agin effects. In addition, health intendance practitioners should contemplate the utilize of a cooling device during the tattoo removal procedure. While the exceptional bulla evolution is a possible side result of Q-switched light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation tattoo removal, if treated appropriately and rapidly by the health care practitioner, it is unlikely that long term consequences would ensue.[57]

Risks [edit]

Although light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation treatment is well known and often used to remove tattoos, unwanted side effects of laser tattoo removal include the possibility of discoloration of the skin such as hypopigmentation (white spots, more common in darker skin) and hyperpigmentation (dark spots) too as textural changes - these changes are ordinarily not permanent when the Nd:YAG is used merely it is much more likely with the use of the 755 nm Alexandrite, the 694 nm Ruby and the R20 method. Very rarely, burns may outcome in scarring simply this usually only occurs when patients do not care for the treated surface area properly. Occasionally, "paradoxical darkening" of a tattoo may occur, when a treated tattoo becomes darker instead of lighter. This occurs most often with white ink, flesh tones, pink, and cosmetic make-upward tattoos.[58] [59]

Some tattoo pigments incorporate metals that could theoretically break downwardly into toxic chemicals in the trunk when exposed to calorie-free. This has non withal been reported in vivo but has been shown in laboratory tests. Laser removal of traumatic tattoos may similarly be complicated depending on the substance of the pigmenting textile. In one reported example, the utilise of a light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation resulted in the ignition of embedded particles of firework debris.[lx]

References [edit]

Notes [edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e Sardana, Kabir; Ranjan, Rashmi; Ghunawat, Sneha (2015). "Optimising laser tattoo removal". Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery. 8 (1): xvi–24. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.155068. PMC4411587. PMID 25949018.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Klett, Joseph (2018). "2nd Chances". Distillations. 4 (1): 12–23. Retrieved June 27, 2018.
  3. ^ a b c d Kent, Kathryn Thousand.; Graber, Emmy 1000. (Jan 2012). "Laser Tattoo Removal: A Review". Dermatologic Surgery. 38 (i): 1–13. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02187.x. PMID 22092752. S2CID 44372752.
  4. ^ Cannarozzo, Giovanni; Duca, Ester Del; Cannizzaro, Maria Vittoria (2017). "Laser tattoo removal: results and problems". PMFA News. 4 (6). Retrieved 28 June 2018.
  5. ^ Mao, Johnny C.; DeJoseph, Louis K. (May 2012). Latest Innovations for Tattoo and Permanent Makeup Removal. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of Due north America. Vol. xx. pp. 125–134. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2012.02.009. ISBN978-1455745142. PMID 22537781.
  6. ^ Arellano, CR; Leopold, DA; Shafiroff, BB (December 1982). "Tattoo removal: comparative study of 6 methods in the sus scrofa". Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 70 (vi): 699–703. doi:10.1097/00006534-198212000-00007. PMID 7146152.
  7. ^ Goh, CheeLeok; Ho, StephanieGY (2015). "Laser tattoo removal: A clinical update". Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery. viii (1): 9–15. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.155066. PMC4411606. PMID 25949017.
  8. ^ Kossida, Theodora; Rigopoulos, Dimitrios; Katsambas, Andreas; Anderson, R. Rox (February 2012). "Optimal tattoo removal in a single laser session based on the method of repeated exposures". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 66 (2): 271–277. doi:x.1016/j.jaad.2011.07.024. PMID 22036610.
  9. ^ a b Sadick, Neil S.; Krueger, Nils (2014). Advances in corrective dermatology, an effect of dermatologic clinics. Philadelphia: Elsevier saunders. pp. 92–93. ISBN9780323263887 . Retrieved 28 June 2018.
  10. ^ "The Harris Poll". Harrisinteractive.com . Retrieved 2016-08-19 .
  11. ^ Armstrong, ML; et al. (Jul 2008). "Motivation for contemporary tattoo removal: a shift in identity". Curvation Dermatol. 144 (7): 879–84. doi:10.1001/archderm.144.7.879. PMID 18645139.
  12. ^ Pires, Candice (i December 2017). "'When we broke up, it was painful to look at': the rise of tattoo removal". The Guardian . Retrieved 28 June 2018.
  13. ^ Bousquet, Kristen (2015-11-24). "12 Celebrities Who Had Tattoos Removed". StyleCaster. Retrieved 2016-08-19 .
  14. ^ Tierney, John (4 January 2013). "You Won't Stay the Same, Study Finds". The New York Times . Retrieved half dozen Jan 2013.
  15. ^ DeMello, Margo (May thirty, 2014). Inked : tattoos and body art around the globe. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 152. ISBN978-1610690751 . Retrieved 28 June 2018.
  16. ^ Kirby, W; Desai, A; Desai, T; Kartono, F; Geeta, P (March 2009). "The Kirby-Desai Scale: A Proposed Calibration to Assess Tattoo-removal Treatments". The Periodical of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. ii (3): 32–7. PMC2923953. PMID 20729941.
  17. ^ Wilhelm, Menaka (March 8, 2018). "Tattoo You lot: Allowed Arrangement Cells Aid Keep Ink In Its Identify". NPR . Retrieved 28 June 2018.
  18. ^ Cuyper, Christa De; Cotapos, Maria Luisa (2009). Dermatologic complications with body art : tattoos, piercings and permanent make-upwardly. Berlin: Springer. p. 24. ISBN9783642032912 . Retrieved 28 June 2018.
  19. ^ Kirby Due west, Holmes E, Desai A, Desai T. All-time Clinical Practices in Laser Tattoo Removal: Tips for improving patient outcomes and managing patient expectations. The Dermatologist, June 2012: 23-28.
  20. ^ Kuperman-Beade, M; Levine, VJ; Ashinoff, R (2001). "Laser removal of tattoos". American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2 (one): 21–5. doi:x.2165/00128071-200102010-00004. PMID 11702617. S2CID 44259544.
  21. ^ "Tattoo Removal Market - Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2017-2023". Business organisation Insider. PR Newswire. Retrieved 23 July 2018.
  22. ^ a b c Lanigan, Sean W. (2000). Lasers in dermatology. London: Springer. pp. 48–55. ISBN9781852332778 . Retrieved 27 June 2018.
  23. ^ Goldman 50. et al. Effect of the laser axle on skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1963;forty: pp. 121–122.
  24. ^ Goldman, Leon (eleven September 1967). "Laser Treatment of Tattoos. A Preliminary Survey of Three Year'southward Clinical Experience". JAMA. 201 (xi): 841–4. doi:x.1001/jama.1967.03130110067016. PMID 6071898.
  25. ^ Kirby, William, Desai, Alpesh, Desai, Tejas, Kartona, Francisa, Tattoo Removal Techniques: Constructive Tattoo Removal Treatments - Part one, Peel and Aging, September 2005.
  26. ^ Omi, Tokuya; Numano, Kayoko (2014). "The Part of the CO2 Laser and Fractional CO2 Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation in Dermatology". Laser Therapy. 23 (1): 49–60. doi:10.5978/islsm.14-RE-01. PMC3999431. PMID 24771971.
  27. ^ Reid Due west.H., McLeod P.J., Ritchie A., Ferguson-Pell Grand. Q-switched ruby laser treatment of blackness tattoos. British Periodical of Plastic Surgery, 1983, 36, 455-459.
  28. ^ Reid, W.H.; Miller, I.D.; Spud, M.J.; Paul, J.P.; Evans, J.H. "Q-switched Scarlet Laser Removal of Tattoo: A ix-Year Review". British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1990 (43): 663–669.
  29. ^ Newstead J. Assessment of laser/skin interactions past histologic and cytogenetic techniques. Ph.D. Thesis, Academy of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 1988.
  30. ^ Sarnoff, Deborah S. "Inquire THE Adept: Can laser handling cause pare cancer?". SkinCancer.org . Retrieved 27 June 2018.
  31. ^ White potato, Michael (July 17, 2016). "My history in lasers, IPLs and rock 'n' gyre…". Mike Murphy's Blog . Retrieved 27 June 2018.
  32. ^ "DERMA-LASE TO Marketplace LASER SYSTEM". Photonics Spectra. Vol. 26. Optical Publishing Company. 1992. p. 28. Retrieved 27 June 2018.
  33. ^ Taylor, C.R.; et al. (Jul 1990). "Treatment of tattoos past Q-switched cerise light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. A dose-response study". Arch Dermatol. 126 (7): 893–9. doi:10.1001/archderm.1990.01670310055007. PMID 2360836.
  34. ^ Kilmer SL, Garden JM. Laser treatment of pigmented lesions and tattoos. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2000 Dec;nineteen(4):239.
  35. ^ Anderson, RR; Parrish, JA (Apr 1983). "Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation". Science. 220 (4596): 524–7. Bibcode:1983Sci...220..524A. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.6836297. PMID 6836297.
  36. ^ Kilmer SL. Laser treatment of tattoos. Dermatol Clin. 1997 Jul;15(3):409–17.
  37. ^ Kirby West, Chen C, Desai A, Desai T. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Mucosal Tattoos Via Q-Switched Laser. Dermatologic Surgery, December 2011.
  38. ^ Ibrahimi OA; Syed Z; Sakamoto FH; Avram MM; Anderson RR. (June 2011). "Handling of tattoo allergy with ablative fractional resurfacing: a novel paradigm for tattoo removal". J Am Acad Dermatol. 64 (half-dozen): 1111–1114. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.005. PMID 21571169.
  39. ^ Beyer, Victor. "Laser Parameters Within Tattoo Removal". Rethink the Ink. Retrieved 21 Dec 2016.
  40. ^ Kilmer, SL; Anderson, RR (Apr 1993). "Clinical use of the Q-switched crimson and the Q-switched Nd:YAG (1064 nm and 532 nm) lasers for treatment of tattoos". The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. 19 (4): 330–8. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.1993.tb00354.x. PMID 8478472.
  41. ^ Alster TS. Q-switched alexandrite laser treatment (755 nm) of professional and amateur tattoos. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995 Jul;33(one):69–73.
  42. ^ F. J. Duarte (ed.), Tunable Laser Applications (CRC, New York, 2009) Chapter 8.
  43. ^ Kirby, William. "The Kirby-Desai Calibration A Proposed Scale to Assess Tattoo-removal Treatments". PMC2923953. PMID 20729941.
  44. ^ Siomos, Konstadinos; Bailey, Raymond T.; Cruickshank, Frank R.; Murphy, Michael J. (1996). "Q-switched laser removal of tattoos: a clinical and spectroscopic investigation of the mechanism". Proc. SPIE 2623, Medical Applications of Lasers 3. 2623: forty. Bibcode:1996SPIE.2623...40S. doi:x.1117/12.230314. S2CID 136771835.
  45. ^ Biesman, Brian S.; O'Neil, Michael P.; Costner, Cara (2015). "Rapid, high-fluence multi-pass q-switched light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation treatment of tattoos with a transparent perfluorodecalin-infused patch: A airplane pilot study". Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 47 (eight): 613–618. doi:10.1002/lsm.22399. PMC5042086. PMID 26266835.
  46. ^ https://world wide web.laserskinsurgery.com/f/Tattoo_Publication_040919.pdf[ bare URL PDF ]
  47. ^ Reddy, Kavitha K.; Brauer, Jeremy A.; Anolik, Robert; Bernstein, Leonard; Brightman, Lori; Hale, Elizabeth; Karen, Julie; Weiss, Elliot; Geronemus, Roy M. (2013). "Topical perfluorodecalin resolves immediate whitening reactions and allows rapid effective multiple pass handling of tattoos". Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 45 (two): 76–80. doi:10.1002/lsm.22106. PMID 23255145. S2CID 35553767.
  48. ^ Vangipuram, Ramya; Hamill, Selina Southward.; Friedman, Paul M. (2019). "Perfluorodecalin-infused patch in picosecond and Q-switched laser-assisted tattoo removal: Condom in Fitzpatrick IV-VI skin types". Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 51 (1): 23–26. doi:10.1002/lsm.23022. PMID 30311666.
  49. ^ Sardana, Kabir; Ranjan, Rashmi; Ghunawat, Sneha (2015). "Optimising Laser Tattoo Removal". Periodical of Cutaneous and Artful Surgery. 8 (1): 16–24. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.155068. ISSN 0974-2077. PMC4411587. PMID 25949018.
  50. ^ Costandi, Mo. "Tats Off: Targeting the Immune System May Lead to Better Tattoo Removal". Scientific American . Retrieved 24 February 2020.
  51. ^ Nelson, Dustin. "Factors Determining Tattoo Removal Success". Fallen Ink Tattoo Removal. Retrieved viii February 2017.
  52. ^ Murphy, Michael J. (2014). "A novel, simple and efficacious technique for tattoo removal resulting in less pain using the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser". Lasers in Medical Science. 29 (4): 1445–1447. doi:10.1007/s10103-014-1542-3. PMID 24584904. S2CID 32154328.
  53. ^ Kirby, William; Desai, Alpesh; Desai, Tejas; Kartona, Francisa. Tattoo Removal Techniques: Effective Tattoo Removal Treatments - Part 2, Skin and Aging, October, 2005.
  54. ^ a b Kirby, William; Koriakos, Angie; Desai, Alpesh; Desai, Tejas (Baronial 2010). "Undesired Pigmentary Alterations Associated with Q-Switched Laser Tattoo Removal" (PDF). Pare and Aging. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-09-28.
  55. ^ Kirby, William; Kaur, Ravneet Ruby; Desai, Alpesh (June 2010). "Paradoxical darkening and removal of pink tattoo ink" (PDF). Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 9 (2): 149–151. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00493.ten. PMID 20618561. S2CID 13284907. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 28, 2010.
  56. ^ Kirby, William, Desai, Alpesh, Desai, Tejas, Kartona, Francisa, Tattoo Removal Techniques: Effective Tattoo Removal Treatments - Role 1, Skin and Crumbling, September, 2005
  57. ^ Kirby W; Kartono F; Desai A; Kaur R; Desai T (Jan 2010). "Treatment of Big Bulla Formation after Tattoo Removal with a Q-Switched Laser". Journal of Clinical and Artful Dermatology. 3 (1): 39–41. PMC2921738. PMID 20725537.
  58. ^ Due south. Varma, et al. Tattoo ink concealment of a yellowish tattoo after Q-switched laser handling. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 2002: Volume 27 Effect 6, pp. 461–463
  59. ^ Holzer A, et al. Adverse Effects of Q-Switched Laser Treatment of Tattoos. Dermatologic Surgery 2007: Volume 34 Outcome 1, pp. 118–122
  60. ^ Taylor Charles R., "Laser ignition of traumatically embedded firework debris," Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1998, volume 22, p. 157–158

Further reading [edit]

  • Bernstein, Eastward. F. (2006). "Laser treatment of tattoos". Clinics in Dermatology. 24 (1): 43–55. doi:x.1016/j.clindermatol.2005.10.025. PMID 16427505.
  • Goldberg, David J. (4 Dec 2007). "Chapter 3: Pigmented Lesions, Tattoos, and Disorders of Hypopigmentation". Laser Dermatology: Pearls and Problems. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. pp. 71–113. doi:10.1002/9780470691991.ch3. ISBN978-1-4051-3420-0.
  • Kirby, W. (2013) Lasers and Free energy Devices for the Skin (2d Edition) Chapter 4: "Tattoo Removal". Ed. Goldman, Fizpatrick, Ross, Kilmer. CRC Press. pp. 74–93. ASIN: 1841849332. ISBN 978-1841849331
  • Kirby, W., Kartono, F., Desai, A., Kaur, R. & Desai, T. (Jan 2010) "Handling of Big Bulla Formation later Tattoo Removal with a Q-Switched Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation", Journal of Clinical and Artful Dermatology
  • Kirby, W., Kartono, F. & Small, R.(September 2011). "Affiliate 30: Tattoo Removal with Lasers". Dermatologic and Cosmetic Procedures in Office Practice. Elsevier. pp: 367-376. ISBN 978-i-4377-0580-5
  • Kuperman-Beade, Thousand.; Levine, V. J. & Ashinoff, R. (2001). "Laser removal of tattoos". American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2 (i): 21–five. doi:x.2165/00128071-200102010-00004. PMID 11702617. S2CID 44259544.
  • Pfirrmann, K.; Karsai, S.; Roos, Southward.; Hammes, Southward. & Raulin, C. (2007). "Tattoo removal- Land of the fine art". Journal of German Dermatology. 5 (10): 889–97. doi:ten.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06405.x. PMID 17910671. S2CID 312548.
  • Vartanian, Varci (July one, 2012) "Your Permanent Record? The Scoop on Tattoo Removal - Give-and-take with Dr. Kirby", The Daily Muse
  • Verhaeghe, Evelien (January 2010). "Chapter 7: Techniques and Devices Used for Tattoo Removal". In De Cuyper, Christa; Pérez-Cotapos Due south, Maria Luisa (eds.). Dermatologic Complications with Body Art . Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 91–105. doi:ten.1007/978-3-642-03292-9_7. ISBN978-3-642-03291-2.
  • Wysong, P. (Baronial xvi, 2011) "Tattoo Removal Comes Of Historic period - An Expert Interview With Dr. William Kirby and Dr. Rady Rahban", Medscape

External links [edit]

  • How Tattoo Removal Works

What Can A Slider Web Tattoo Turn Into,

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tattoo_removal

Posted by: nolandwasee1998.blogspot.com

Related Posts

0 Response to "What Can A Slider Web Tattoo Turn Into"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel